The most famous example of the DIAL body mark is presented in Extraordinary: the Stan Romanek story. Stan is an experiencer who documented hundreds of encounters. However, he was convicted of charges related to subject matters I will not name on this website. The documentary suggests that he was framed. I bring this up first and foremost as a disclaimer for anyone looking into the story. For me, the geometry is clear and he is clearly a DIAL experiencer, regardless of his criminal status. It should be obvious to anyone reading this that I firmly believe in the DIAL experience as an anomalous means of NHI communication, otherwise I would not associate my claims with such a challenging story to work with.
Stan’s DIAL story
The documentary is the best place to get more information about his story, but I will summarize the events related to the DIAL. Stan hurt his knee to such an extent that he needed surgery to fix it and he required a brace to walk before the surgery. An encounter happened, from which he awoke without the brace, but with five dots along his knee. He was able to walk normally and found his brace melted outside of his house (melting medical devices is associated with ET/NHI influences for him). He went back to the doctors to confirm that he was healed.
Media skepticism regarding physical proof of alien encounters
Stan discussed the DIAL marking with ABC news in an interview that explored his physical evidence. Just like the Phoenix Lights, the experiencers and the media both acknowledge the geometric qualities of the marks but no one, until my dreams told me to, performed Euclidean constructive analysis of the marks. The congruence of the Phoenix Lights geometry with Stan’s markings suggest that either this geometry is associated with real NHI encounters or else there is an elaborate hoax involving the Phoenix Lights, Stan, and at least 6 other DIAL experiencers including myself. Interestingly, Chris Bledsoe’s recreation of his famous 2007 encounter expresses similar geometry.
The ABC news interviewer suggested that the DIAL is self-inflicted. While this may be a possibility in an isolated case, it seems highly unlikely that at least 6 other people would self-inflict with such geometric precision. It took me 6 months and intervention from dream characters to identify the geometry. Even though I have identified its characteristics, I still seek a definitive understanding of even its mathematical significance.
Dream shamanism is a sufficient hypothesis that involves ET encounters only when experiencers offer their testimony
However, people require a hypothesis and a mechanism to understand or even comprehend such anomalous markings. In the past, people have used similar markings, although much less geometric, as physical evidence for alien abduction phenomena. Actually, the interview with Stan is about that. Rather than put forward the ET hypothesis, I look to the precedents of anomalous healings and body marks in religious phenomenon like angel visitation or stigmata.
I hypothesize that these body marks are the result of dream encounters with real entities, albeit in the dream world. Next, I point to the traditional and shamanic understanding that dreams real and involve the spirit world. Finally, I point to stigmata and other dream anomalies, documented by Krippner (another Stan), to include precognition, entity encounters, miraculous healing, and apportation. Given these precedents, we do not need to hypothesize ET or alien abduction to study the phenomenon. Vallee has pointed out sufficient precedent in fairy lore for both the body marks and the fantastic journey elements. However, the testimonial narratives of the experiencers regarding ET/NHI encounters need to be accounted for in any hypothesis and should be respected.
Geometric analysis of Stan’s DIAL
Stan’s DIAL is very characteristic of the phenomenon. It includes the puncture wound appearance, the association with ET/NHI dream-like experiences, the intuition of meaning, and also miraculous healing (associated with one other DIAL).
The geometric figure may be constructed from the Vesica Pisces using the standard bisection and golden section of the initial circle’s diameter. The size of the dots appear proportional to the length of the line. An additional feature of DIAL is that some of the dots are placed in clear reference to points of geometric coherence, but not centered on them. For example, the central dot is place to the right side of the center of the figure, but in proportion to the size of the dots.
The geometry of Stan’s DIAL feels like a declaration of the mark. It is almost stereotypical and lacks the feeling of nuance and creativity that I have come to associate with the mark and related UAP geometries. It feels to be a strong and obvious expression of the DIAL phenomenon, as if the mark makers knew Stan’s story would be highly public and documented, so they presented the mark in a stereotypical way. I suspect there are many other geometries within Stan’s story that would find corroboration in the stories of many other experiencers should someone devote the time to research.