Podcasters Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp recently released videos of a UAP taken on a marine base near 29 Palms in California that resemble the Phoenix Lights. There has been news and social media attention of their release of the videos and some implication that the entire events were only flares. I have been the only researcher in nearly 26 years to apply Euclidean Constructive Geometry to the Phoenix Lights, which demonstrates several geometric characteristics that may imply that the Lights are an intelligent and intentional communication using the universal language of geometry.
The Phoenix Lights are two distinct phenomena that occurred around March 13, 2023. First, there was a “boomerang” craft that was seen flying over the state. Second, there was a geometric formation of lights, orbs, or flares (depending on your perspective) that expressed clear and distinct geometry, as filmed by Tom King. Tom has done wonderful research putting together a timeline of the events and sharing his discovery of UAPs that express similar geometry. It appears that his deeply embodied a geometric intuition associated with the Phoenix Lights in 1997 enabled his intuitive identification of the UAP pattern.
The presence of illumination flares, either as the phenomenon or as an element in the cover-up, is an interesting characteristic of the Lights. The Oracle of the Phoenix offers a flare rebuttal. Regardless of interpretation or analysis, the similarity between the appearance of the orbs, the presence of geometry, and the presence of military flares suggests that both the Phoenix Lights and the Mojave Triangle are similar phenomena. This post presents my geometric analysis of the Mojave Triangle and its comparison with the Phoenix Lights.
I learned the application of ruler and compass geometry to UAP pulsations and formations through the direct instruction of ET/NHI dream characters. It sounds fantastic and imaginative becuase it is. I make no ontological claims about the ET/NHIs outside of my dreams, although I do credit my dreams for my insights (like many other geometers in history). Their instruction comes through teaching dreams, meaningful coincidences, and direct intuition. They instructed me that their reality is so far different than our that the difference between “real” UAPs like orbs and “fake” UAPs like misapprehended flares is relatively meaningless. They instructed me to think of them as intelligent geometries, not as physical craft. In this way, the revelation of Euclidean Constructive Geometry within the formation of flares may be as meaningful as the revelation of geometry in orbs, primarily because the constructive analysis reveals that we are dealing with mathematical (not physical) objects in both cases. It is important to note that geometry is intuitive and imaginative, with a long history of mysticism involving dreams, like Descartes, or entities, like Socrates.
I invite your consideration before continuing because this post may be triggering. Dreams are often triggering and taboo because they deal with unconscious material or topics outside of consensus worldviews. The analysis does not posit any ontological claim, rather it focuses on the geometry within the footage and not the actual craft or objects. I will use the term flares, orb, or UAP interchangeably. To my eyes, hovering spheres of light that have no relative motion are “orbs” while dropping sources of light that are surrounded by smoke and change relative position are “flares”.
The world of UFOlogy has offered many conclusions about the Phoenix Lights regarding their nature as flares or something else. The only conclusion I can come to is that it is astounding that not a single analysis focused on the simple ruler-and-compass geometry of the Lights (or flares) filmed by Tom King, in which he exclaimed “There’s geometry in there”. Not a single researcher, debunker, or enthusiast considered the geometry of those lights as they appeared in his footage. How did the world of UFOlogy miss such an obvious clue? I have personally focused on geometric analysis and eye-witness testimony to inform my inquiry, not assumptions that they are flares just because the military says they were (I am still looking for footage of known flares that has similar geometry qualities).
This analysis is not conclusive. I am traveling without access to a printer, so I traced the geometry on paper directly from the laptop. I would need to analyze other known flares to make conclusions regarding whether these are flares or “real” UAPs. In any case, I find the demonstration of the geometric themes to be interesting. Both human and non-human intelligence (like the hypothesized ETs) produce geometric signatures. For example, the strobe pattern of known planes express the geometric themes of bisection and golden ratio, which is identical to the strobe pattern of the “Navy Pyramid”.
It is important to note that geometry is intuitive and imaginative. Intuition is characterized by a heightened sense of meaning and certainty. However, the strength and certainty of an intuition needs to be validated before making claims based upon it because intuition is often non-veridical or incorrect.
Geometry and Appearance of the Phoenix Lights
My analysis focuses on the Phoenix Lights as filmed by Tom King, during which he exclaims, “There’s geometry in here”. I performed congruence testing between the frames of his video and demonstrated that the orbs do not move relative to one another, therefore the geometric analysis of one frame applies to the entire footage. While the flare hypothesis has been applied to these orbs and even adopted by King, there is strong analysis that demonstrate their movement relative to one another or the ground, nor is there photographic or testimonial evidence of the smoke typical of illumination flares. Tom King described his relationship with the flare hypothesis, then introduces two videos that express highly similar geometry on his website. Regardless of hypothesis, Tom has discovered a geometric pattern involving footage across decades and countries. Euclidean constructive geometry demonstrates that the formation of these UAPs express similar geometric themes such as the bi-symmetry of bisection and the golden ratio.
My strategy is not to debunk, rather it is to look for signs of geometric communication. The clear signs of geometric communication include symmetry, whole number ratios, golden ratio, and intuitions of meaning. The geometry present in the Phoenix Lights is demonstrably similar to other anomalous geometries like body marks or the Celestial Phenomenon Over Nuremberg. My analysis is only conclusive upon demonstration that there is geometry and that it is communicative, not just accidental. The geometry needs to fall in line with my documented hypotheses and be associated with an intuition of meaning in order for it to even be considered a possible communication.
There are several geometric characteristics I understand to be characteristic of the Phoenix Lights and related phenomena:
- Capacity to generate a Euclidean Constructive Geometric figure using simple ruler and compass methods, typically only: straight line, circle, vesica pisces, bisection, and division by golden ratio
- Capacity to construct figure beginning with one magnitude (circle used to draw Vesica Pisces around UAP formation)
- Demonstrates both obvious and thematic symmetry, like performing the same operation on two sides of the figure that produce a thematically symmetric figure
- Orbs are proportional to fundamental magnitude used in the construction, typically these are whole number ratios like 1/8, but they also may be derived from the implied geometries
- Orbs relate to the points of intersection in meaningful but displaced ways. For example, an orb may be displaced up/down/left/right of the geometric intersection point on a multiple of the orb’s radius.
Congruence testing frames from beginning, middle, and end of footage
If we are dealing with geometric communication, I expect that the communication will be repeated or obvious in some way. If we are dealing with accidental formation of flares, I expect that the formation will shift over time. The Phoenix Lights remained steady over about 4 minutes of continuous filming. The longest video of the Mojave Triangle is around half a minute.
The steadiness of the formation may be tested and measured through a very simple technique I called “congruence testing”. You take a frame from the beginning, middle, and end of the footage then overlay them on each other. If everything lines up, they’re congruent. If not, then something moved. I used screenshots of videos, then import them into GIMP and use only the move and rotate transforms to align the images. In this test, I used different colors for each frame to visually see the congruence.
To my eyes, all videos except video #2 expressed congruence across their frames. When I compared a frame from the 1st second and 24th second of video #2, I observed that the right bottom-most orb was displaced downward and left one orb length.
This image demonstrates congruence in 4 of the orbs, shown by the overlapping greenish-blue and white orbs (colorized for comparison). The circled orb appears to have moved throughout the video. This movement may be geometrically meaningful or it may indicate the orbs are actually physical objects that are slowly moving or both.
Video #1
The analysis of video 1 demonstrates a highly coherent geometric figure composed using bisection and golden section techniques. The formation, as filmed in this video, appears to be a triangle, with the topmost orbs at the vertex of the triangle. The left edge of the triangle has an orb whose placement is described using the golden ratio. The right edge of the triangle has an orb whose placement is described using bisection.
Interestingly, when you draw out the Vesica Pisces based on the size of the formation, then continue the lines of the triangle, they chords drawn on near the circumference are divided in the golden ratio by the diameter described by the lowest two orbs. This indicates to me that the geometry is highly coherent because the lines used to construct the figure reveal insights regarding the formation.
The three analysis pages are different views of the same formation. I’m trying to produce an analysis that feels like it clicks, but I am not quite there. I am not sure where the center of the figure is, nor which line should be understood as the fundamental radius of the Vesica.
Video 2
Video 2 presents a slightly different formation than video 1. It is unclear to me where the center is because the edges of the triangle do not point to an orb at their vertex, rather it is slightly displace. Similarly, the technique I used to find the golden ratio in the chords from video 1 no longer reveal the golden ratio, but I am able to find it by shifting the “diameter” of the image up. In this video, the chord defined by the extension of the triangle is divided in the golden ratio by the line that connects the middle orbs, not the bottom orbs.
Interestingly, the vertex of the triangle falls along the line used to bisect the lines drawn between the middle orbs and the bottom orbs.
Video 3
Video 3 does not appear to present a triangle. Rather, it appears to present two lines, with the top defined by 3 orbs and the bottom defined by the left and right most orbs. The length of the lines are in golden ratio with one another. When I drew the implied triangle, I saw that the orbs along the side of those triangles divide the lines in golden ratio (right edge) and bisection (left edge).
Video 4
Video 4 has a very similar geometry to video 3, similarly squashing the triangle. Like video 3, I do not feel the center of the figure. Like video 3, I see golden ratio and bisection expressed in the placement of the orbs.
Video 5 Orbs
Video 5 presents only 4 orbs from a distance, but it also shows the formation relative to known illumination flares. This formation presents a feeling of clear center because most of the orbs line up in ways that require no discernment to connect. The center is clearly the vertex of the triangle.
The right edge of the triangle may be divided by bisection and the golden ratio, which mark out the circumference of the middle orb on the right edge. I have noted and puzzled about this geometric property of some UAP footage. They seem to position themselves between a bisection and golden-section point.
In the second analysis image, with the Vesica Pisces, we can see that the triangle is composed of two right triangles. The height of the triangle appears to be determined by the golden section of the base of the triangle.
Video 5 Known Illumination Flares
At some point in the sighting, the military launched illumination flares above the orbs. The story goes that the witnesses could see a craft behind the orbs that disappeared as soon as the flares were launched. Video 5 shows the flares going in and out of focus, then views the triangle formation. I thought it would be valuable to analyze as a control and took 3 stills at different points.
When the flares are in focused in second 24, it appears that the ratio of the flare size and the line drawn through them is in golden ratio. In second 11, when the flares are out of focus, they form a perfect Vesica Pisces. In second 17, again out of focus, they form a Vesica Pisces like figure that divides the main line in golden ratio.
It is surprising to me that the only three frames I extracted expressed geometric coherence, although I have been training eyes to see these proportions. Personally, I understand that Vesica Pisces that is obvious in the out of focus flares is a like dream sign, message, or omen to use the Vesica Pisces to illuminate the figures, which is what I have done in this analysis.
Low light photo
The podcasters released one low-light photograph of the event taken on an iPhone. This formation is most clearly similar to the King video of the Phoenix Lights. One shared characteristic is the main line composed of orbs set in golden ratio or bisection, with an orb at the bottom right. The rightmost orb of the main line and the bottom right orb may be connected using a line perpendicular to the main light, which tangents the orbs in opposite ways. Similarly, the left most orb of this photo and the Phoenix Lights is displaced down from the main line.
The formation appears to be constructed using simple methods, as demonstrated by the fact that all orbs touch a single Vesica Pisces.
Intuition of meaning, ambiguous flares, and imaginal faces?
I personally believe that the phenomenon (or noumenon) that I am describing expresses through both the reality of UAPs like orbs and the unreal appearance of orbs through the illumination flares. I have analyzed dozens of similar cases using a basic geometric pattern. The pattern is composed of the Vesica Pisces, with one side divided using bisection (rational number) and the other divided using the golden section (irrational number). The pattern is quite literally a mandala that embraces both rational and irrational magnitudes. I believe it is inviting us to embrace the duality of real/unreal, true/false, disclosed/secret.
When I level-enhanced a frame from video 3 in order to trace it from my laptop to a piece of paper, I noticed that there is a slight vertical line from several orbs. I would imagine that this line could be explained by smoke from military flares. Personally, I believe we need to prepare ourselves for the reality that the Phenomenon is something other than “real” UAPs or orbs and “fake” flares. When we see these anomalous geometric figures, we experience intuitions of meaning that may be life-changing, even if the physical medium of the geometry resolves to known objects like illumination flares.
It is very clear that these geometric light phenomena are associated with military flares and disinformation campaigns. They clearly are muddying the waters. There are multiple phenomenon happening. One may be the “true” or “real” manifestation of UAPs or orbs or craft. The other is an illumination flare event. They have similar properties like being lights in the sky and hovering. They have dissimilar properties like smoke, color, and geometric stability. However, there are precedents of this geometry in our recorded history and in prehistory (see my analysis of the Phoenix Lights for more information).
If this event is similar to the others I have analyzed, then I would predict the obvious, yet frequently unnoticed, presence of a face that requires imagination to see it. Similar geometry-associated faces include the face on Mars, the faces in the terrain observed in The Oracle of the Phoenix, and the smiling sun in the Celestial Phenomenon over Nuremberg.
Personal reflections
This UAP and its analysis is interesting for me. While I immediately recognized similarities between the Phoenix Lights and the Mojave Triangle, I was skeptical of the news and footage. I have analyzed other known flares to contain similar geometry (golden ratio is everywhere in the world). There is a very real and objectively demonstrable phenomenon that involves geometry and UAPs, which has ironically and intentionally been obscured by military illumination flares.
However, the hypothesis that my dream friends would put forward is that it doesn’t matter. The geometry itself is alive, intelligent, and intentional. Millions of people were touched by Tom King’s geometric intuition when he filmed the Phoenix Lights. Many thousands have seen the geometry associated with the Mojave Triangle because of the recent podcast episode. If the ET/NHIs actually inhabit geometry, dream, intuition, or consciousness instead of just little green or grey bodies, then what does it matter if it arises from the military’s flares or disinformation campaigns?
Geometry isn’t like another math. It is a spiritual practice that has transpersonal significance. Each analysis begins with “casting a circle” around the figure, which is quite literally the basis for magic. The geometry touches my heart and dreams, even if it it is “just flares”. My analysis frequently happen upon waking from a dream. The day before, I’ll encounter a UAP film or perform the initial preparation work. I’ll go to bed and have dreams, then wake up and do the analysis. The dreams seem to help. Sometimes, I’ll perform a ritual beforehand or I’ll feel strong energies. My heart has literally pounded in my chest as I cast the first circle or complete an analysis.
The Mojave Triangle inspired only mundane feelings in my heart and dreams. I performed the analysis out of a sense of mundane curiosity and out of the knowledge that it is relevant to my inquiry. I am quite shocked to discover that the geometric themes I associate with “real UAPs” appeared in the triangle. I came at this expecting to see flares and disinformation because of the association with the military, but I have demonstrated geometric properties in the footage that appears stable (except for one orb).
I don’t recall any dreams, but had an interesting experience occur. Just after completing my analysis, my father-in-law asked me if I left the house last night. I am staying at my in-law’s house in their basement. My father-in-law goes through my bedroom to get to his office. I went to bed early last night and slept in about an hour and half later than usual. My father-in-law saw me in bed when he went to his office, but didn’t see me when he left a hour or so later around midnight. While he simply may have not seen me and I may have an unremembered bathroom visit, he said that the bed sheets were opened as if I left, and we enjoyed several jokes about alien abduction.